• BFY Proceedings
• Volumes
• About the Proceedings
  • General Information
  • Editors
  • Frequently Asked Questions
• Authors
  • Manuscript Preparation
  • Manuscript Submission
  • Publication Rights
  • Review Process
  • Brief Checklist for Authors
• Peer Reviewers
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Questions to Ponder
  • Ethical Guidelines

BFY III Review Form Statistics

The Editors of the BFY III Proceedings received 18 papers for the BFY III Proceedings. All 54 of the 54 solicited peer reviews were received. The acceptance rate for the BFY III Proceedings was 72.2%.

The following data details the use of each category of the BFY III Proceedings Peer Review form.

1. Interest/Value to the Advanced Lab Community

   

   1 selection of 1 (Weak)
   2 selections of 2
   3 selections of 3
   23 selections of 4
   24 selections of 5 (Strong)
   

2. Content Novelty

   

   1 selection of 1 (Weak)
   3 selections of 2
   13 selections of 3
   20 selections of 4
   16 selections of 5 (Strong)
   

3. Strength of Research

   

   2 selection of 1 (Weak)
   6 selections of 2
   14 selections of 3
   19 selections of 4
   12 selections of 5 (Strong)
   

4. Conclusions

   

   8 selection of 1 (Weak)
   7 selections of 2
   11 selections of 3
   19 selections of 4
   8 selections of 5 (Strong)
   

5. Organization of Ideas

   

   1 selection of 1 (Weak)
   2 selections of 2
   14 selections of 3
   20 selections of 4
   16 selections of 5 (Strong)
   

6. Grammar and Formatting

   

   2 selection of 1 (Weak)
   7 selections of 2
   8 selections of 3
   18 selections of 4
   18 selections of 5 (Strong)
   

7. Comments for the Editor

   54 Comments Attached

8. Comments for the Author

   55 Comments Attached

9. Indicate your recommendation for this paper below. Due to the quick turn-around time required, manuscripts that require substantial or content-based modifications will likely be rejected.

   

   12 selections of Do not Publish
   41 selections of Publish