Conference on Laboratory Instruction Beyond the First Year of College Proceedings

BFY II Review Form Statistics

The Editors of the BFY II Proceedings accepted 27/32 papers for an acceptance rate of 84%.

The following data details the use of each category of the BFY II Proceedings Peer Review form.

  1. Interest/Value to the Advanced Lab Community

    2 selection of 1 (Weak)
    5 selections of 2
    8 selections of 3
    37 selections of 4
    40 selections of 5 (Strong)

  2. Content Novelty

    3 selections of 1 (Weak)
    6 selections of 2
    20 selections of 3
    32 selections of 4
    31 selections of 5 Strong

  3. Strength of Research

    5 selections of 1 (Weak)
    9 selections of 2
    20 selections of 3
    27 selections of 4
    31 selections of 5 Strong

  4. Conclusions

    5 selections of 1 (Weak)
    9 selections of 2
    20 selections of 3
    24 selections of 4
    34 selections of 5 Strong

  5. Organization of Ideas

    3 selections of 1 (Weak)
    3 selections of 2
    13 selections of 3
    32 selections of 4
    41 selections of 5 Strong

  6. Grammar and Formatting

    1 selection of 1 (Weak)
    7 selections of 2
    10 selections of 3
    34 selections of 4
    40 selections of 5 Strong

  7. Comments for the Editor

    90 Comments Attached

  8. Comments for the Author

    92 Comments Attached

  9. Indicate your recommendation for this paper below. Due to the quick turn-around time required, manuscripts that require substantial or content-based modifications will likely be rejected.

    15 selections of Do not Publish
    76 selections of Publish